May 20, 2024
1 min read

Post-Brexit border arrangements to cost $6 bn  

The first phase of Britain’s so called new Border Target Operating Model, requiring additional certification, came into force on Jan. 31…reports Asian Lite News

The British government estimates it will spend at least 4.7 billion pounds ($6 billion) on implementing post Brexit border arrangements, after repeated delays in setting new rules, parliament’s spending watchdog said on Monday.

Britain voted to leave the European Union in 2016 but, such was the scale of the task to untangle supply chains and erect customs borders, that it is only this year setting new rules.

The first phase of Britain’s so called new Border Target Operating Model, requiring additional certification, came into force on Jan. 31.

A second phase started on April 30, introducing physical checks at ports. A third phase, requiring safety and security declarations is slated for Oct. 31.

The National Audit Office (NAO) said the 4.7 billion pounds figure is the amount the government forecasts it will spend on the 13 most significant programmes to manage the passage of goods across the border post Brexit and improve performance over the lifetime of the programmes.

The government delayed the implementation of full controls five times since the end of the EU exit transition period on Dec. 31 2020.

This caused uncertainty for businesses, extra costs for government and ports and increased the biosecurity risk to the UK, the NAO said.

“The repeated delays in introducing import controls, and difficulties forecasting requirements, have resulted in government expenditure on infrastructure and staff that were ultimately not needed,” it said.

“Late announcements about policy and uncertainty about the implementation of controls have also reduced the ability of businesses and ports to prepare for changes.” The NAO noted that while post EU exit border processes have operated “relatively smoothly”, businesses trading goods between the UK and the EU have faced additional costs and administrative burdens.

The watchdog was also critical of the government’s 2025 UK Border Strategy, which was published in 2020, saying it “lacks a clear timetable and an integrated cross-government delivery plan, with individual departments leading different aspects of implementation.”

The government also needed “a more realistic approach” to digital transformation, the NAO said.

ALSO READ-Farmers protest post-Brexit rules and trade deals

Previous Story

Brighton city gets its first Muslim mayor

Next Story

Modi rubbishes opposition’s unemployment narrative

Latest from -Top News

Islamabad Welcomes Trump Mediation Move

Pakistan said that it reaffirms that “settlement” of the Kashmir “dispute” should be “in accordance with the relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions…reports Asian Lite News Pakistan on Sunday welcomed US President

Marcos camp takes on Duterte clan in key poll

The outcome could shape the country’s strategic positioning over the remaining half of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s six-year term, which began in 2022 In political rallies, Senate hearings, and voter surveys ahead

Bangladesh bans Awami League

Several political parties and groups in Bangladesh are protesting by surrounding the residence of Muhammad Yunus, the Chief Adviser to the interim government, demanding a ban on the Awami League Bangladesh interim

Brazil’s Lula to visit China

Beijing is Brazil’s biggest trading partner. Its exports to China reached more than $94 billion last year, according to the United Nations Comtrade Database Brazil’s president will begin a five-day trip to

China, US hold ‘de-escalation’ trade talks

The US president praised the “very good” discussions and deemed them “a total reset negotiated in a friendly, but constructive, manner” Donald Trump has hailed a “total reset” in US-China trade relations
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Truss becomes chief negotiator in post-Brexit talks

He expressed discontent over the stricter measures recently introduced by

Brexit Costs UK Economy £140 Billion

The average Briton was nearly 2,000 pounds worse off in