June 12, 2023
2 mins read

UK lawmakers flag illegal Migration Bill

The parliamentary committee questioned whether the law would act as a deterrent and said it “could lead to people taking other, potentially more dangerous, routes into the UK.”…reports Asian Lite News

A committee of British lawmakers said Sunday that the UK will break its international human rights commitments if it goes through with government plans to detain and deport people who cross the English Channel in small boats.

Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights said the Illegal Migration Bill “breaches a number of the UK’s international human rights obligations and risks breaching others.”

Scottish National Party lawmaker Joanna Cherry, who chairs the committee, said the law would leave most refugees and victims of modern slavery with no way of seeking asylum in Britain.

“By treating victims of modern slavery as illegal migrants’ subject to detention and removal, this bill would breach our legal obligations to such victims and would risk increasing trafficking of vulnerable people,” she said.

The committee urged the government to make sweeping amendments to the bill, including exempting trafficking victims and curbing the government’s power to detain people indefinitely. The government, which had pledged to “stop the boats,” is unlikely to heed the recommendations.

The legislation bars asylum claims by anyone who reaches the UK by unauthorised means, and compels officials to detain and then deport refugees and migrants “to their home country or a safe third country,” such as Rwanda. Once deported, they would be banned from ever re-entering the UK.

Britain’s Conservative government says the law will deter tens of thousands of people from making perilous journeys across the Channel and break the business model of the criminal gangs behind the trips. Critics, including the United Nations’ refugee agency, have described the legislation as unethical and unworkable.

The parliamentary committee questioned whether the law would act as a deterrent and said it “could lead to people taking other, potentially more dangerous, routes into the UK.”

The bill has been approved by the House of Commons, where the governing Conservatives have a majority, but is facing opposition in Parliament’s upper chamber, the House of Lords. The Lords can amend the legislation but not block it.

More than 45,000 people, including many fleeing countries such as Afghanistan, Iran and Syria, arrived in Britain in small boats last year, up from 8,500 in 2020.

The government has housed many of those awaiting asylum decisions in hotels, which officials say costs taxpayers millions of pounds (dollars) a day. Authorities have said they plan to place new arrivals in disused military camps and a barge docked on the southern English coast.

ALSO READ-Priti Patel faces legal action over Ukraine visa delays

Previous Story

Priti Patel, Kulveer Ranger in Johnson’s honours list

Next Story

Canadian Opposition backs Indian students facing deportation

Latest from -Top News

Right groups slam Pakistan’s ‘draconian’ cyber law 

The controversial legislation, which criminalises “fake or false” information, has sparked criticism from rights groups, journalists, and civil society.  Human Rights Watch (HRW) has raised serious concerns over Pakistan’s recent amendments to

Jaishankar, UNGA Prez discuss UN agenda 

UNGA President Philemon Yang visits India for high-level talks with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, focusing on multilateral reforms and global cooperation.  External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar met Philemon Yang, President of

Reliance to invest Rs 50,000 cr in Bengal  

Reliance Industries Chairman Mukesh Ambani on Wednesday announced a fresh investment commitment of Rs 50,000 crore in West Bengal by the end of this decade….reports Asian Lite News Attending Bengal Global Business
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Migration bill cruel, Sadiq Khan tells Braverman

Of those arriving illegally via small boats, Indians form a

UN slams UK govt’s Illegal Migration Bill

The cessation of the stand-off between the unelected chamber and