October 4, 2022
2 mins read

Xi’s ‘new era’ discourse

Xi calls Mao Zedong’s time the ‘revolution period,’ Deng Xiaoping’s the ‘building period,’ Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao’s the ‘reform period’ while calling his term a ‘whole new era.’…reports Asian Lite News

Ahead of the 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), President Xi Jinping is pushing for a “new era” discourse to strengthen his personal power.

Hugo Jones, writing in The Diplomat said that the “new era” – connoting a fundamental historical shift – has been systematically fused with the persona of Xi in Chinese official discourse.

Significantly, Xi calls Mao Zedong’s time the ‘revolution period,’ Deng Xiaoping’s the ‘building period,’ Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao’s the ‘reform period’ while calling his term a ‘whole new era.’

For the past five years, the term “new era” has appeared with increasing frequency in China’s white papers, propaganda, official speeches, and public diplomacy.

From early on in his premiership, it was clear that Xi Jinping sought historical significance greater than that of his two immediate predecessors, Hu Jintao and Jiang Zemin. This was also encouraged by growing Chinese nationalism, which predates Xi, reported The Diplomat.

For Xi, while the “new era” is scalable from the local to the international context, it is ultimately all about China, “It will be an era that sees China moving closer to center stage and making greater contributions to mankind.”

The discourse of a “new era” serves three functions. First, it bolsters the CCP’s legitimacy in a domestic context. The “new era” is also used to provide the context for sensitive issues such as Tibet, Xinjiang, and Taiwan, said Jones.

Second, the discourse of a “new era” is used to empower the CCP and challenge norms internationally. The strongest example was on February 4, when Xi and Russian President Vladimir Putin released a joint statement on “International Relations Entering a New Era,” a major foreign policy declaration that aligned China with Russia weeks before the invasion of Ukraine.

The discourse of a “new era” is also used to challenge the US, NATO, and Western countries that belong to the “old,” unipolar era of global politics. The “new era” is presented by China as the just temporality of a multipolar, post-imperial world.

Third, the discourse of a “new era” serves to reinforce the idea that the government of China, and the governance of Xi, are always thinking in the long term, operating on fundamentally different time scales to the Western world. This reinforces certain orientalist tropes that China is inherently “better” at grand strategy, reported The Diplomat.

However, despite its popularity, this narrative disguises the reality that Xi and the CCP are often as short-sighted as other regimes – the chaotic “zero-COVID” policy is just one example. This reminds us that we should take the narrative of a “new era” with a fair degree of skepticism, said Jones. (ANI)

ALSO READ: China urged to stop repression of Tibetans through Zero-Covid policy

Previous Story

Pak PM rejects flood relief dashboard

Next Story

Jaishankar to visit New Zealand and Australia this week

Latest from -Top News

After Pakistan, China Backing Iran Too?

China and Iran signed a 25-year comprehensive cooperation agreement that covered trade, energy and security, showcasing the strategic value that Beijing places on Tehran….reports Asian Lite News Despite its long-standing claims of

US-India ties is a slow-motion catastrophe

For the first time in two decades, Trump’s actions, statements, and coercive tone have made relations with the US a combustible domestic political issue in India, writes Manoj Menon The post-globalisation uncertainty

Modi Welcomes Marcos Jr to Delhi

PM Modi Welcomes Philippines President Marcos Jr to Strengthen India-Philippines Ties…reports Asian Lite News Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday warmly welcomed Philippines President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr at Hyderabad House in

Is Bangladesh Turning Into a Theocratic State?

The rise of radical Islamic influence under Yunus’s watch threatens to transform Bangladesh from a secular democracy into a theocratic state….writes Anna Mahjar-Barducci Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus’s transition from economist

Post-370 Kashmir Reinvents Itself

The developments suggest that Kashmir’s post-abrogation journey is not merely political – it is profoundly social, economic, and cultural….writes Shashikant Trivedi Six years after the abrogation of Article 370, Jammu and Kashmir
Go toTop

Don't Miss

India bans 54 Chinese apps over national security threat

According to sources, many of these applications are refurbished versions

China, Russia Ready to Tackle Security Threats Together

Zhang said China and Russia have maintained a high-level bilateral