August 24, 2021
2 mins read

SC says shocked by HP govt’s delay in litigating rape matter

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hrishikesh Roy said the state government filed a special leave petition with a delay of 636 days and Covid was cited as the reason for delay…reports Asian Lite News

The Supreme Court on Monday pulled up Himachal Pradesh for citing Covid induced delays in litigating a sensitive matter where a minor girl was allegedly sexually assaulted by her father.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hrishikesh Roy said the state government filed a special leave petition with a delay of 636 days and Covid was cited as the reason for delay.

“The order was passed on December 5, 2018, and thus, we asked counsel as to which year was the world affected by Covid, 2019 or 2020 to which learned counsel’s answer initially was 2019, possibly to cover the delay but realising that it was 2020, he states that the papers were not received by him,” it said.

To say the least, “we are shocked at the conduct of the petitioner-state and the manner of conduct of the litigation in such a sensitive matter”, the bench added.

Rape. (File Photo: IANS)

It remarked that there is not even a semblance of explanation for delay. “We however, would not like to dismiss the petition on limitation because of the seriousness of the issue involved. But that is no excuse why the state should not be made accountable of such inordinate delay and the persons responsible for the same,” the bench said in its order.

The court imposed cost of Rs 25,000 on the state government for delay in filing the SLP. “We thus, condone the delay but subject to imposition of costs of Rs 25,000 to be deposited with the Supreme Court Group ‘C’ (Non-Clerical) Employees Welfare Association within four weeks with a direction to hold the enquiry, fix responsibility and recover the amount from the officers concerned,” it said in its order.

The top court issued notice to the man, who was acquitted in the case, on the SLP filed by the state government challenging the high court verdict.

In December 2018, the high court had delivered the verdict on an appeal filed by the man against the trial court’s August 2017 order convicting him under the provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The accused was sentenced to 10 years jail by the trial court.

ALSO READ: Persecuted Afghans finding solace in India

Previous Story

BJP, Cong at loggerheads in K’taka over statement equating RSS to Taliban

Next Story

Modi, Merkel discuss security situation in Afghanistan

Latest from -Top News

UAE-India pact fuels future biz leaders

MoU between ADSM and UIBC-UC to foster entrepreneurship, mentorship, and collaborative research between UAE and India through 2028 In a landmark partnership aimed at cultivating the next generation of global business leaders,

‘1,563 Indians deported from US so far’

Though the ministry did not specify the reasons behind the deportations, the figure reflects a sharp uptick in removals under the Trump administration’s renewed focus on immigration enforcement…reports Asian Lite News More

Why TRF’s Terror Tag Matters

This wasn’t just counterterror—it was a signal. India fused intel, precision strikes, and tech for a swift, strategic blow. TRF wasn’t just named—it was hit….writes John Spencer  Today, July 17, 2025, the

Jaishankar Hails TRF Terror Tag

The US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, made the official announcement on Thursday…reports Asian Lite News Reacting to the US designating The Resistance Front (TRF), a proxy of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), as a
Go toTop

Don't Miss

‘1.14 Lakh Startups Fuel Job Creation’

The state-owned e-commerce platform Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC)

‘Brunei a key partner in India’s Act East Policy’

PM Modi said the basis of friendship between the two