August 24, 2021
2 mins read

SC says shocked by HP govt’s delay in litigating rape matter

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hrishikesh Roy said the state government filed a special leave petition with a delay of 636 days and Covid was cited as the reason for delay…reports Asian Lite News

The Supreme Court on Monday pulled up Himachal Pradesh for citing Covid induced delays in litigating a sensitive matter where a minor girl was allegedly sexually assaulted by her father.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hrishikesh Roy said the state government filed a special leave petition with a delay of 636 days and Covid was cited as the reason for delay.

“The order was passed on December 5, 2018, and thus, we asked counsel as to which year was the world affected by Covid, 2019 or 2020 to which learned counsel’s answer initially was 2019, possibly to cover the delay but realising that it was 2020, he states that the papers were not received by him,” it said.

To say the least, “we are shocked at the conduct of the petitioner-state and the manner of conduct of the litigation in such a sensitive matter”, the bench added.

Rape. (File Photo: IANS)

It remarked that there is not even a semblance of explanation for delay. “We however, would not like to dismiss the petition on limitation because of the seriousness of the issue involved. But that is no excuse why the state should not be made accountable of such inordinate delay and the persons responsible for the same,” the bench said in its order.

The court imposed cost of Rs 25,000 on the state government for delay in filing the SLP. “We thus, condone the delay but subject to imposition of costs of Rs 25,000 to be deposited with the Supreme Court Group ‘C’ (Non-Clerical) Employees Welfare Association within four weeks with a direction to hold the enquiry, fix responsibility and recover the amount from the officers concerned,” it said in its order.

The top court issued notice to the man, who was acquitted in the case, on the SLP filed by the state government challenging the high court verdict.

In December 2018, the high court had delivered the verdict on an appeal filed by the man against the trial court’s August 2017 order convicting him under the provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The accused was sentenced to 10 years jail by the trial court.

ALSO READ: Persecuted Afghans finding solace in India

Previous Story

BJP, Cong at loggerheads in K’taka over statement equating RSS to Taliban

Next Story

Modi, Merkel discuss security situation in Afghanistan

Latest from -Top News

Multi-alignment, upgraded

With US ties strained and China tense, New Delhi taps Europe’s harder edge for co-development, clean tech and strategic autonomy, writes Manoj Menon India is recalibrating its great-power hedging as frictions with

Reeves urged to break manifesto pledges

Chancellor under pressure as £40bn fiscal gap looms, with critics warning against a “pasty tax” budget of piecemeal revenue raisers…reports Asian Lite News Rachel Reeves is facing growing unease inside Labour’s ranks

Starmer to Visit India on Wednesday

UK and India to cement strategic ties with new free trade agreement and deeper cooperation across defence, technology and climate Prime Minister Keir Starmer will make his first official visit to India

UAE, India join on child services

The United Arab Emirates and India have opened discussions to enhance cooperation in integrated child development services, focusing on early childhood education, nutrition, and child participation initiatives. The talks took place on
Go toTop

Don't Miss

‘Condom Politics’ in Poll-Bound Andhra

Simultaneous elections to the Assembly and Lok Sabha are likely

Sensex, Nifty Firm as FY 2023-24 Ends

Sensex settled 0.88 per cent or 639 points higher at