October 7, 2021
2 mins read

CPI-M slams Forest Act amendments proposed by Env ministry

Karat’s letter came two days after the Ministry came out with a consultation paper seeking comments on a number of changes to the Forest Act….reports Asian Lite News

Criticizing the proposed changes to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) on Wednesday said it will end up privitizing forests and forest resources.

Given the context of privatization of infrastructure projects which require forest land, the proposals will not only facilitate takeover of forest land, but make it cheaper and easier for corporates, intending to take the benefits of privatization, a letter by CPI-M leader Brinda Karat to Union Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav said.

Karat’s letter came two days after the Ministry came out with a consultation paper seeking comments on a number of changes to the Forest Act.

“This also includes mining companies with the mining sector being opened up for takeover by domestic and foreign companies. This is what underlies the points raised in the note, which we oppose as they are more concerned about protecting private interests and projects rather than addressing environment concerns,” Karat said.

The proposals tend to dilute the rights of the States to notify forests thereby further centralizing authority in the central government, she pointed out.

Stating that the “thrust of the Consultation Note is to loosen definition of forests, protected forests, deemed forests etc, so as to remove them from the conditions of diversion to non-forestry purposes without any reference as to how this will affect tribal communities and forest dwellers,” Karat alleged that the note is completely silent on “protection of the rights granted by law to tribal communities and other traditional forest dwellers.”

The proposal amounts to liberalization of the present structure to permit easier diversion of forest land for non-forestry purposes without heed to any regulation, she further said, adding, “this will end up privatising forests and forest resources.”

If really necessary, as case by case examination by MoEFCC may show, then any exemption may be granted by a duly authorized Expert Committee, rather than through a blanket exemption provision as proposed, the letter, also released to the media, said.

“I would request you not to go ahead with these proposals as they are nothing but liberalization to favour private interests over the interests of tribal communities, traditional forest dwellers and environmental concerns,” Karat urged Yadav.

ALSO READ: UN seeks India’s wheat for starving Afghanistan

Previous Story

Mizoram Covid cases breach 1L mark, central team studying situation

Next Story

Russia’s S-400 dangerous, hopeful of resolving issues with India: US

Latest from -Top News

Pakistan may face stricter IMF terms

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) will undertake its next funding review for Pakistan in the second half of 2025, with 11 new conditions now attached to the continuation of its Extended Fund

Indian diaspora in Japan backs Operation Sindoor

Members of the Indian diaspora in Japan have strongly endorsed Operation Sindoor, India’s targeted military response to the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir, praising Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s leadership and

What Sri Lanka Can Learn from Pahalgam

If Sri Lanka’s support for India in combating terrorism is genuine, how can Pakistan—widely accused of using terrorism as a tool against India—be treated as an equal partner….writes A. Jathindra While references
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Healthy Office Environment Boosts Employee Well-being and Productivity

Food and nutrition have a deep correlation with mental wellbeing,

India rejects Yale environment index rating

As per Yale Centre for Environmental Law & Policy website,